Equal Protection

faith without child protection is dead

Category: Blog

Your blog category

  • Letter to Judges & State Attorneys

    The below missive was sent today, by email, to the Judges of the 12th Circuit of Florida (Sarasota), and all State Attorneys of Florida (there are twenty):

    Dear Judge/State Attorneys & Assistants,

    The right to seek redress of grievances in court is granted under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

    Failure to address a manifest injustice (systemic constitutional violation) that is brought before the court constitutes Deprivation of Rights under the Color of Law, which is a crime. The court must defend the constitution and the children of its jurisdiction, not commit crimes.

    It is inexplicable why the judges doubt the constitution. I have tried three times in the 12th circuit courts, speaking plain English, toward this end. It does not matter if a newborn boy is skinned when motivated by sexual titillation or sexual repression. It is Captial Sexual Abuse.

    The child cannot distinguish between practitioner and perpetrator. It is human trafficking at scale. It is Aggravated Child Abuse, Battery, and Sexual Assault. 

    Personal protections are addressed in the Bill of Rights, the 13th Amendment (which prohibits treating anyone as chattel slave), the 14th Amendment (Equal Protection), and the Nuremberg Code (in USA v Brandt, et al., several doctors were hanged for the same conduct), and in the Civil Rights Act (a bias crime is a hate crime).

    Cutting the genitals of an incognizant child is not medicine. Surgery is reserved as therapy for injury or disease. Inflicted circumcision is iatrogenic harm. Full stop.

    The rule of law is not the personal property of judges. It is the property of every citizen. It is incumbent upon the court to address the matter head on, not to follow the lead of defense counsel who stand with their face to a tree and claim that they do not see the forest.

    The law strongly supports every citizen’s right to security of person, and there is absolutely no legal basis for performing elective surgery on a healthy non-consenting person. 

    Parents are victims of medical fraud. Attorney Peter Adler wrote the book, Circumcision is a Fraud. Psychologist Ron Goldman, PhD wrote The Hidden Trauma about circumcision. Attorney Eric Clopper staged a play at Harvard, “Sex & Circumcision” (available free on YouTube), for which he was fired.

    Eric Clopper is lead counsel on Hadacheck v. Oregon, and he is the Director of Intact Global.

    The intactivism movement is growing rapidly. Honoring the rights of newborn boys is manifest destiny. But justice delayed is justice denied, especially when children can be saved from crime today. Mesmerization, like ignorance, is no defense in the law.

    There is no right to violate a right, absent due process of law. I know compassionate people work in the 12th Circuit Courts of Florida, and I urge you all to press the matter ceaselessly. There is no reason why another child should be scarred for life. 

    For perspective please note that the circumcision rate in Florida is under 40%. It is under 50% in the US as a whole, and under 30% world-wide. So you can see that being whole is not a medical emergency and is no one’s business but the person to whom the genitals are attached.

    A video of the procedure is linked on the homepage of my website. Granted, it is not easy to watch, and common sense dictates that it is not legal to do, either.

    It is not an arcane matter only decipherable by specialists. Drawing from the title of Thomas Paine’s book, it is ‘common sense’ to urge the rebuke of such tyranny.
    I should state the remedy along with the problem. The remedy is squarely based in consent. A child can consent to circumcision when old enough to judge the matter, whether the reason is religious, prophylactic, aesthetic, or hygiene. And this still leaves surgery available at all times in the case of a medical emergency.

    Sincerely,

    broadfork.com